改革发展成果共享视域下的行政性行业垄断与规制

[摘要] 当下中国行政性行业垄断的广泛存在不仅破坏了公平竞争的市场秩序，而且通过妨碍利润共享、拉大行业收入差距、侵蚀消

>> 反垄断法对行政性垄断的规制与不足 论行政性垄断规制执法 对推进我国行政性垄断行业改革的政策建议 区域性行政垄断的危害及其规制 中国行政性垄断的原因、行为与破除 关于行政性垄断的认识与思考 规制效率、反垄断法与行政垄断行业改革 浅析我国行政性垄断的成因及其合理化规制建议 行政垄断与规制 整体主义视域中的行政垄断规制 论出租车行业的行政性垄断 行政垄断的危害与法律规制 美国州行为豁免原则的适用及其对我国规制行政性垄断的启示 我国行政性垄断的现状及对其法律规制存在的缺陷 行政性垄断及反垄断法律规制述评 检察监督视角下创制性行政过程的规制 浅析我国国情下的行政性垄断 浅谈行政性垄断 论行政性垄断 中国农村的行政性金融垄断：症结与消解 常见问题解答 当前所在位置：.

2012 Fortune Global 500. http：///fortune500/c/2012-07/09/content_106535.htm.

[11]张五常. 经济解释（卷三）受价与觅价[M]. 北京：中信出版社，2012. 115.

Zhang Wuchang. Economic Explanation （vol. 3）Price Taking and Price Searching. Beijing： CITIC Press，2012. p115.

[12]李明岩. 民企500强利润之和不及五大行折射四大问题[N]. 中华工商时报，2012-09-10.

Li Mingyan. That Profits Earned by Top 500 Private Enterprises are Less than those of 5 Banks Reflects 4 Problems. China Business Times，2012-09-10.

[13]陈钊，万广华，陆铭. 行业间不平等：日益重要的城镇收入差距成因[J]. 中国社会科学，2010（3）.

Chen Zhao，Wan Guanghua，Lu Ming. Interindustry Income Inequality： An Increasingly Important Cause of Income Disparity in Urban Chinaa Regression based Decomposition. Social Sciences in China，2010（3）.

[14]傅娟. 中国垄断行业的高收入及其原因：基于整个收入分布的经验研究[M]. 世界经济，2008（7）.

Fu Juan. High Incomes of Monopolistic Industries in China and Its Causes： an Empirical Research Based on Whole Income Distribution. Journal of World Economy，2008（7）.

[15]周光辉，殷冬水. 垄断经营：社会正义的困境[J]. 社会科学战线，2012（2）.

Zhou Guanghui，Yin Dongshui. Monopolistic Operation： the Dilemma of Social Justice. Social Sciences Front. 2012（2）.

[16]叶林祥，李实，罗楚亮. 行业垄断、所有制与企业工资收入差距[J]. 管理世界，2011（4）.

Ye Linxiang，Li Shi，Luo Chuliang. Industrial Monopoly， Ownership and Enterprises Wage Inequality. Management World，2011（4）.

[17]丁启军. 基于规制视角的行业性行政垄断问题研究[D]. 山东大学博士学位论文，2011. 93.

Ding Qijun. Research on Industrial Administrative Monopoly from the Perspective of Regulation. Doctoral Dissertation of Shandong University，2011. p93.

[18]时建中. 我国《反垄断法》的特色制度、亮点制度及重大不足[J]. 法学家，2008（1）.

Shi Jianzhong. The Characteristics、Bright Points and Significant Defects of the Anti-monopoly Law in China. Jurists Review，2008（1）.

[19]李晓宁. 国有垄断与所有者缺位：垄断行业高收入的成因与改革思路[J]. 经济体制改革，2008（1）.

Li Xiaoning. StateOwned Monopoly and Owner’s Absence： Causes of the High Incomes of Monopolistic Industries and Their Reform Route. Reform of Economic System， 2008（1）.

（作者：张贤明，吉林大学行政学院院长、教授；杨博，吉林大学政治学理论博士研究生，长春130012）

On Administrative Industrial Monopoly and Regulation from the Perspective of

Equal Share of the Reform and Development Fruits

Zhang XianmingYang Bo

[Abstract]The widespread administrative industrial monopoly in China not only undermines the market order of fair play， but also has adverse effect on the equal share of the reform and development fruits by hindering the equal share of profits， widening the gap of income among industries， and eroding the consumer's surplus. For this reason， it's necessary to regulate the administrative industrial monopoly by optimizing the market structure， improving the Anti-monopoly Law and its implementation mechanism， accelerating the separation of enterprise from government as well as reinforcing supervision on the basis of state security and steady development of economy and society.

[Key Words]administrative industrial monopoly，fair play， equal share of fruits

[Author]Zhang Xianming is Professor and Dean at School of Administration， Jilin University， Changchun 130012；Yang Bo is Doctoral Candidate at School of Administration， Jilin University. Changchun 130012