基于农户收入异质性视角的农村饮水供给效果评估

摘 要：农村饮水是社会主义新农村建设与和谐社会构建的重点内容之一。目前，农村饮水安全问题是农民最关心、最迫切需要解决的

>> 基于农户收入异质性视角的农田水利设施供给效果分析 基于农户异质性视角的退耕还林农户收入研究 基于农户视角的农村公共产品供给效果评价 基于知识异质性团队的异质性知识网络运行机制 企业异质性视角下产业空间分布的“二重性”：基于前沿文献的讨论 农户异质性对农业技术培训参与的影响 基于不同收入水平农户的农田水利设施供给效果研究 异质性合作社内源型资本供给约束的实证分析 股东异质性的历史分析 异质性思维 何谓异质性？ 基于异质性知识获取视角的高校教学团队提升路径 选择效应：异质性视角下的企业区位决策 知识异质性视角下的企业知识创新能力评价指标体系研究 人力资本异质性视角的国际贸易溢出效应研究 市场竞争视角下的高管异质性薪酬差距 企业异质性与企业家知识异质性的耦合性分析 理性程度的异质性：基于理论与实践的考察 基于异质性的中小企业融资难问题研究 基于微观异质性的新新经济地理研究 常见问题解答 当前所在位置：。

[28]钟建华、于澜，2006：《浅谈农村人畜饮水安全》，《内蒙古水利》第3期。[Zhong Jianhua and Yu Lan， 2006， “Discussion on the safety of rural drinking water”， Inner Mongolia Water Resources， 3.]

[29]周晓东，2015：《辽宁省农村饮水安全水质检测指标与频次对比分析》，《水利技术监督》第4期。[Zhou Xiaodong， 2015， “Comparative analysis on detection index and frequency of rural drinking water quality in Liaoning Province”， Technical Supervision in Water Resources，4.]

[30]周志霞、柯兵、黄大寒、喻群，2008：《农村饮水安全项目绩效评价体系研究》，《行政事业资产与财务》第6期。[Zhou Zhixia， Ke Bing， Huang Dahan and Yu Qun， 2008， “Study on performance evaluation system of rural drinking water safety project”， Assets and Finances in Administration and Institution， 6.]

[31]朱玉春、唐娟莉、罗丹，2011：《农村公共品供给效果评估：来自农户收入差距的响应》，《管理世界》第9期。[Zhu Yuchun， Tang Juanli and Luo Dan， 2011， “Evaluation on the supply effects of rural public goods： the response from farmers’ income disparity”， Management World， 9.]

[32]朱玉春、王蕾，2014：《不同收入水平农户对农田水利设施需求意愿分析――基于陕西、河南调查数据的验证》，《中国农村经济》第1期。[Zhu Yuchun and Wang Lei， 2014， “Farmers’ willingness demands for farmland water conservancy facilities with different income levels：Based on the survey data from Shaanxi， Henan Province”， Chinese Rural Economy， 1.]

[33]庄承彬、黄河鸿、林娴，2010：《基于云理论与层次分析法的农村饮用水安全诊断》，《灌溉排水学报》第4期。[Zhuang Chengbin， Huang Hehong and Lin Xian， 2010， “Diagnoses of the security of drinking water in rural areas based on cloud model and analytic hierarchy process”， Journal of Irrigation and Drainage，4.]

[34]Yang Meini， Li Dingfang and Yang Jinbo， et al.， 2007， “FANNBased Surface Water Quality Evaluation Model and Its Application in the Shaoguan Area”， Geospatial Information Science，4.

[35]Yilmaz Icaga， 2007， “Fuzzy evaluation of water quality classification”， Ecological Indicators，3.

Evaluation on the Supply Effects of Rural Water in the View of Farmers’ Income Heterogeneity：An Investigation From the Midwest

Tang Juanli

（Business School， Zhengzhou University）

Abstract：Rural water is one of the important content of construction of new village and harmonious society. At present， rural water safety is the most concerned and most urgent problem. An investigation of 1571 farmer households shows that evaluation on the supply effects of rural water is relatively high. The overall probability of “very good” and “good” is 74.87%， of “badly” is 1.99%， and of “not good” is 9.09%. The result is linked to the farmers’ heterogeneity. In this paper， ordered logistic model is adopted to analyze the factors that could influence the evaluation result of rural water supply effect. Supporting degree of policy， farmers' evaluation of town government， whether the water could be up to the needs of life， how water change， comparative advantage are drawn as the key factor that influence farmer households’ evaluation on rural water supply effect. Other factors such as village type， distance from the county， sex， age， educational level， farmer households’ participating satisfaction degree， source and quality of drinking water are also identified as noticeable elements to significantly influence households’ evaluation result. The paper proposes policy strategy to promote the supply effects of rural water from promoting the supply level， producing leading function of the government， guidancing and encouraging farmers to actively participate in the rural water， and targeting selection the supply mode.

Key Words：Rural Water； Farming Households on Different Income Level； Supply Effect； Ordered Logistic Model