论惩罚性赔偿在专利侵权领域的适用

时间:2022-10-17 09:43:21

论惩罚性赔偿在专利侵权领域的适用

摘要:2012年8月9日,国家知识产权局公布了《中华人民共和国专利法修改草案(征求意见稿)》,作为其亮点之一,惩罚性赔

>> 关于专利侵权的惩罚性赔偿的思考 惩罚性赔偿制度在大规模侵权中的适用分析 惩罚性赔偿在环境侵权案件中的适用 浅析惩罚性赔偿制度在环境侵权中的适用 消法惩罚性赔偿的适用 试论环境民事侵权适用惩罚性赔偿原则 试论惩罚性赔偿制度在我国食品安全领域的适用 试论产品侵权的惩罚性赔偿问题 论惩罚性赔偿 论环境侵权民事责任的惩罚性赔偿 论知识产权侵权责任中惩罚性赔偿的扩张 论环境侵权损害中的惩罚性赔偿机制 惩罚性赔偿的功能与适用原则探讨 房屋买卖中惩罚性赔偿的适用 专利保护与惩罚性赔偿 浅析惩罚性赔偿在旅游合同中适用的必要性 浅析惩罚性损害赔偿在中国反垄断法中的适用 论惩罚性赔偿制度 论惩罚性赔偿在消费者权益保护中的完善 中外侵权法惩罚性赔偿之比较 常见问题解答 当前所在位置:l.

[2]国家知识产权局.关于专利法修改草案(征求意见稿)的说明[EB/OL].[2012-08-10]..

[3]廖志刚.专利侵权损害赔偿研究[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2007(3):90-94.

[4]金福海.论惩罚性赔偿责任的性质[J].法学论坛,2004(3):59-63.

[5]杜甲华.我国建立惩罚性赔偿制度之理论障碍批判[J].社会科学辑刊,2009(5):66-69.

[6]尹志强.我国民事法律中是否需要导入惩罚性赔偿制度[J]. 法学杂志,2006(3):76-79.

[7]王利明.美国惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J].比较法研究,2003(5):1-15.

[8]许明月.资源配置与侵犯财产权责任制度研究――从资源配置的效果看侵犯财产权民事责任制度的设计[J].中国法学,2007(1):78-90.

[9]曾世雄.损害赔偿法原理[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:16.

[10]王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):112-122,206-207.

[11] DOBBS DAN B.Handbook on the law of remedies: Damages,Equity,Restitution[M].West Pub. Co. (St. Paul),1973:356.

[12]关淑芳.惩罚性赔偿制度研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2008:39-41.

[13]四宫和夫.日本民法总则[M].唐晖,译.台北:五南图书出版公司,1995:4.

[14]于敏.日本侵权行为法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998:47.

[15]边沁.道德与立法原理导论[M].时殷弘,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:58.

[16]赵建国.2012年我国受理专利申请量超205万件创新高[EB/OL].[2013-01-08].http:///Index_NewsContent.aspx?newsId=55408.

[17]最高人民法院.2012年中国法院知识产权司法保护状况[EB/OL].[2013-04-22].http:///article/detail/2013/04/id/949841.shtml.

[18]国务院.国家知识产权战略纲要 [EB/OL].[2008-06-10].http:///zwgk/2008-06/10/content_1012269.htm.

[19]和育东,石红艳,林声烨.知识产权侵权引入惩罚性赔偿之辩[J].知识产权,2013(3):54-59.

[20]张新宝.侵权责任构成要件研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:443-445.

[21]张新宝,李倩.惩罚性赔偿的立法选择[J].清华法学,2009(4):5-20.

[22]朱凯.惩罚性赔偿制度在侵权法中的基础及其适用[J].中国法学,2003(3):84-91.

[23]王学峰.论知识产权侵权引入惩罚性赔偿责任制度[J].北京航空航天大学学报:社会科学版,2006(1):54-57.

[24]和育东.专利侵权损害赔偿计算制度:变迁、比较与借鉴[J].知识产权,2009(5):7-18.

[25]POLINSKY M A,SHAVELL S.Punitive damages:An economic analysis[J].Harvard Law Review,1998(4): 48- 51.

The Application of Punitive Damages in the Patent Infringement

PAN Jia1.2

(1.School of Law, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, P. R .China; 2. Guangxi Nanning City Intermediate People's Court, Nanning 530021, P. R .China)

Abstract:

The patent law modification draft was released for public comment by the State Intellectual Property Office on August 9, 2012.As one of the bright spots, the rules of the punitive damages is concerned by all sectors of society. Some people approve of it, and others oppose it. At present, Chinese courts generally apply the compensatory damages to patent infringement compensation through empirical investigation, which is difficult to adapt to the modern complex infringement. However, the punitive damages which make up for the defect of compensatory damages, can protect fully the legitimate rights and interests of the patentee, impede patent infringement and encourage law-abiding behavior. The development of modern tort liability law provides a theoretical basis for the punitive damages. According toChina's realistic national condition, we can deliberately introduce the punitive damages to the patent infringement at present. But we should restrict the applicable conditions and the amount of damages, make the standard of compensation in details. The punitive damages article of this draft has yet to be perfected.

Key words: punitive compensation; patent infringement; draft for public comment

上一篇:真实的野夫在诗歌里 下一篇:过去常常”经常用