A Feminist Stylistic Analysis of Genderfree Pronouns in Sula

Abstract：As one of Morrisons early creations， Sula has aroused a lot of concern since its publication in 1973.As a literary discourse of Morrisons artistic and ideological expression， Sula reveals the writers ideological orientation about womens fate and identity.Based on stylistics for its objective analysis of language in literary works and its advantages in revealing deep meaning， this thesis takes a Sara Mills feminist stylistic analysis of the language of Sula， hoping to bring to light Morrisons feminist ideas embedded in the stylistic features of the work.

Key words：Sula； feminist stylistics； genderfree pronouns

Genderfree words are carefully chosen in Sula to criticize generic forms which present the male as an unmarked and the female as a marked form.Many researches have shown that sexist language does have farreaching effects not only in the short term on peoples relation to others and their environment， but also in the long term on their selfimage and confidence.Genderfree words are widely used in Sula， which testifies that Morrison wants to create womens own language， thus challenging the male domain ideology.

Genderspecific words signal a male orientation which was criticized strongly by feminists.The most wellknown and typical example of genderspecific or sexist language is the generic pronoun “he”， and it is frequently referred to as “heman” language， using “he” to refer to both male and female.Genderfree nouns are used deliberately by Morrison to advert the stereotypical views of the sexes.Two aspects can be classified in describing the usage of genderfree words in Sula.

Firstly， femalespecific pronouns are used more frequently in Sula instead of malespecific pronouns， and even genderfree pronouns， thus establishing a high position of female status in the community.In the first paragraph of the first chapter of Sula， the whole story begins with an introduction of the setting， within which there appears such a sentence： the owner cooked in her hat because she couldnt remember the ingredients without it （Morrison， 1982：1）.Both “her” and “she” in the sentence are used to refer to the owner whose gender is not clear.There is an option to be chosen because “she” can be seen to contain “he” within it.

The usage of “heman” language can not be found throughout the novel， representing an attitude that women are by no means a part of men.Besides， the specific pronoun “she” is given overwhelming priority to any other pronouns， leaving a striking impression that this novel focuses on females instead of males.The seemingly common wishes are by no means easy for black women in America with sexual discrimination at that time， while an equal circumstance is created in Sula via the use of genderfree pronouns.