Building Moderately Prosperous Society Culture Education Indicators System in Mi

Abstract. Culture is an important indispensable development indicator of educational indicators of a well-off society. Cultural and educational indicators of well-off society should be up with culture and education indicators of modern and international standards， and should be phased， versatility and uniqueness. Pursuant to Yunnan’s 16th economy National Party Congress， and “the new three-step “ development strategy ，culture and education indicators of well-off society ， by 2010， 2020， 2050 can be divided into early， middle and high three culture and education indicators. Cultural and educational level of national attention can be reflected on the culture and education funding from the size； the gross enrollment rate can render the level of culture and education development； the quality of the population can reflect the substance of the national cultural and educational development； information technology and international cultural and educational level can highlight trends in the development of culture and education

Keywords： Well-off society， culture and education， index system， Minority Areas， Yunnan Province

1. Cultural Education Indicators --Measure of Well-off Society

Congress report proposes building a moderately prosperous society in six aspects of target system， which specifically to say， is the more affluent economy standards， new standards of democracy and the rule of law， science， education， culture， new standards， more harmonious society standards， improving people's lives standards， standards of social sustainable development. As a cultural and educational standard among the new standard education and culture， it naturally constitutes a comprehensive well-off society in an important system component. Culture and education since it built a moderately prosperous society in the meaning， then， should take on the historical mission of building a moderately prosperous society to provide intellectual contributions， intellectual and personnel supporting and accelerating the comprehensive well-off society in history process. To accelerate this historical process， there must be clear quantitative criteria. Congress report puts culture and education among the well-off society， placing it in strategic priority， emphasizing the revitalization of the nation to be the first cultural and educational revitalization. Cultural and educational level is an important symbol and the basis of building a moderately prosperous society. Level of Cultural and educational direct impacts the development process of a comprehensive well-off society. Therefore， to build a moderately prosperous society， culture and education， science and technology are an important indicator. To build a moderately prosperous society index system is imperative.

Well-off society is a historical process， a continuously advancing stage. Therefore， to develop a different culture and education indicators bases on different stages of the development of a well-off society. We believe that a well-off society， culture and education indicators pay attention to two aspects： one is the cultural convergence and modernization of education indicators； another is convergence with international standards. At the same time， we need to clearly understand the historical position in which to see their gap with international standards， neither arrogant nor belittle. Only in this way can we make our well-off society to advance faster modernization goals.

Culture and cultural education indicators should have three characteristics： The first is stage. According to Congress proposed Yunnan economic， social 'new three-step "development strategy， based on our 2010， 2020， 2050 these three times， you can divide culture and education indicators into early， middle and high 3 culture and education indicators， so both stages are dynamic. The second is versatility. This refers to both culture and cultural education and cultural modernization of education indicators index vertical convergence， also horizontal comparison with international standards. The third is unique. Compared with the common statistical indicators of cultural education， cultural education indicators reflect a more comprehensive cultural and educational development of a country or region， which has a unique value.

2. Cultures and Education Indicator System in Minority Areas

2.1 Indicators of Culture and Education Incremental

Indicating the overall development of education at all levels， Well-off minority areas in Yunnan index system of education should include the following several basic indicators ： Elementary and junior high school enrollment rate， which indicates the status of popularizing nine- year compulsory education. Party and government requires that until 2000 national compulsory education should be basically universal （including vocational education for junior secondary）， representing 85% of the total population in areas popularizing nine -year compulsory education. “This is a comfortable standard of basic education indicators that reflect the level of basic education and development it can be decomposed into primary school enrollment rate of school-age children literature regulations of the State： junior secondary enrollment rate reached about 85%， the country primary school enrollment rate of over 99%. Due to the different parts in academic， school age requirements are slightly different， and therefore cannot unify what age to what age population of national entrance requirement， the proportion of students accounted for only a very practical circumstances decision ； secondary school enrollment rate， indicating that although the development of the second stage of education junior section overlap with the first indicator， it is an essential indicator for international comparisons ； every million people in a few college students showed the third level of education development which should include regular higher education andeducation in two parts. Although the use of university enrollment rate of school-age population in higher education is more clearly in the elite type （excellence type）， popular or universal stages of development taking into account the well-off stage of entering higher education， is still only in the early stages of development aces type， and the use of every million people in a few college students are relatively easy to operate. It is easy to know the age structure of the translation， so we use this indicator； urban per square workers fewcollege students， urban workers receive higher indicates the status of continuing education； 3 to 6 enrollment rate of children indicates the status of pre-school education can also be subdivided into pre-school year， the enrollment rate for children of pre-school years. Considering that many urban families， parents of high cultural level， although not send their children to the park， the child can receive a certain level of knowledge and intellectual development of education in the family. Therefore 3 to 6 year-old children in the park can be considered education indicators. The children whose parents have a high school education level， included in the scope of education.

2.2 Culture and Education Index

The quality of urban and rural citizens and social workers is the development of education for a long period of time accumulated effect： the literacy rate of the population aged over 15， indicating non-illiteracy， reflecting the results of basic education and literacy education， Which should be listed separately in young adults literacy rate， indicating that educational status and non- status illiteracy rate of young population. Party and government require “until the 2000， we should national basically eliminate illiteracy， so that young non- illiteracy rate reached about 95%." This is a well-off society to the quality of the population’s minimum requirements. The proportion of Secondary or higher education in the total population indicating a higher cultural quality of the population in the proportion of the total population， reflecting the current situation and the past for a long period of time ，the development of the secondary and tertiary education ； every ten thousand employees of state-owned enterprises indicating the state of scientific and technical personnel and research and development capabilities in state-owned enterprises ， reflecting the current and the previous period of the development of higher education ； number of agricultural technicians of every million rural population ， indicate status and the strength of the development of modern agriculture， reflecting the situation prevailing in the previous period and rural education and rural personnel training.

3. Current Major Issues and Cultural Education Index System in Minority Areas in Yunnan

3.1 Theoretical Basis of Existing Indicators System Is Weak， Loose Structural Framework

Compared with the developed areas of culture and education index system， cultural and educational indicator system Yunnan is lack of theoretical foundation and analytical framework. Currently， the classical theory of the international system is the basis of culture and education indicators of human capital theory. The content of the framework consists three parts "Input - - process-- output "， which is theoretical and framework indicator system adapted by international organizations. The culture of Yunnan Education Indicators System Management Mod mainly planned development of culture and education scale internal statistics， is actually a collection of cultural and educational statistics， the lack of connection between the internal logic of each index， which itself is not a theoretical foundation or theoretical framework. Yunnan culture and education indicator system is based on culture and education mostly objects of cultural investment in education， teachers and other cultural and educational elements to classify statistical indicators， in large part describing the basic situation of Yunnan scale cultural and educational aspects and achievements. But compared with "Cultural education input - process - output " ，the theoretical framework， it cannot reflect supply and demand changes in the development of culture and education， the occurrence of intrinsic motivation and the process can not reflect the performance of cultural and educational inputs and outputs. But it is difficult to reflect on indicators content -depth analysis and interpretation. In addition， there is no independent cultural education in Yunnan index system； the existing indicators are attached to basic cultural education indicators， a strong dependence and randomness. We can say that cultural and educational indicator system as a subsystem of Yunnan Cultural Education Indicators System of Yunnan relatively weak. Its theoretical foundation is weak， and the structural framework loosely problem is more prominent.

3.2 Part of Key Cultural Education Indicators Are Missing or Very Weak

Yunnan culture and education after decades of development， its structure and content indicators are continually improve and enrich， but some key indicators of culture and education is either missing or very weak， mainly in the following areas：

First， the number of teachers is more concerned about information security training and treatment indicators are missing. Yunnan existing indicators for the kindergarten teachers mainly related to the number of faculty members， principals and teachers in full-time education， job title， etc.， can only reflect the size of the kindergarten teaching staff basic information and quality information. It is lack of training teachers in training school protection and treatment -related indicators. Secondly， we are concerned about the size and number of indicators Park Office， Office of insufficient quality related Indicators Park and existing indicators on the campus office park conditions mainly related to campus buildings and facilities， such as the size and number of indicators related indicators of quality office park. First grade reflects the situation on campus， such as compliance and quality indicators office park inadequate. Campus and facilities compared to the size and number of indicators that reflect the level of campus standards and indicators of the situation which has policy guidance， better reflecting the conditions around the office and school quality level.

3.3 Policies of the Existing Index System

The current system of international organizations and major cultural and educational indicators were developed with special emphasis on the functional link indicators and socio-economic environment and the cultural and educational policies for the service. The current of index system of culture and education on social and economic environment and culturally sensitive education-related policies are inadequate， mainly in the following aspects. First， the existing index system of socio-economic， demographic and other background reflected is inadequate. In describing the situation of China's cultural and educational development， there is no relevant indicators to illustrate the development of culture and education macro background， such as population size， economic and social development. Culture and education within the system is just a statistical and closed isolated description. Out of context and conditions of the development of culture and education and to explore the cultural and educational development in isolation is meaningless. Secondly， the existing index system of the main issues of cultural education reform and development in response is inadequate. In recent years， the development of education in China with the development of the political economic and social development is through a rather complicated history. Our culture and education also faces many unprecedented problems and challenges， but these are not reflected in dictators. Under such circumstances， as Chinese enterprises promote the reform of the social function of separation. Each school has produced a qualitative change in the current situation. There is a basic statistics on campus， and there is still a continuation of the planned economy， seriously out of touch with the times. Index failed to reflect the cultural and educational matters， the main contradictions Sector development and reform leading to not effectively evaluate and monitor the current level of development of culture and education.

References

[1]Li Lan. Urbanization Development in Minority Areas in Western [D]. ??Central University for Nationalities， 2003.

[2]ZhuYF. Minority areas building a moderately prosperous society of national laws and regulations Study [D]. Central University for Nationalities， 2004.

[3]Chenlipeng. On Local Education Legislation Chinese Ethnic Studies [D]. ??Central University for Nationalities， 2004.

[4]Matingyu. In Yunnan during the Republican National Education Research [D]. ??Central University for Nationalities， 2004.

[5]Xu Caiming. Townships government research [D]. ??Central University for Nationalities， 2005.

[6]Huang Songwen. The early 21st century， the legal protection of rural poverty in the Western Minority Area Studies [D]. ??Central University for Nationalities， 2005.